XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XMVE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XMVE.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVE.DE returned 9.87%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVE.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVE.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 17.97% return.
XMVE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 10.01% | 21.50% | 8.85% | 19.87% | -12.89% | 16.87% | -3.71% | 17.86% | -6.36% | 13.58% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.97% | 53.72% | -0.44% | 43.89% | -21.77% | 14.38% | -18.70% | -3.73% | -9.08% | 35.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVE.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XMVE.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMVE.DE
IBCJ.DE
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMVE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.27 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 7.84 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -67.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVE.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -67.13% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -9.98% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -18.52% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | -47.29% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -1.66% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -39.16% | +34.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 4.16% | -1.41% |
Volatility
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) is 3.86%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that XMVE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMVE.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 4.31% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 17.59% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 23.03% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 26.71% | -10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 24.92% | -9.46% |
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMVE.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 2.62% | 2.92% | 2.64% | 4.73% | 1.87% | 6.84% | 0.00% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMVE.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMVE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XMVE.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMVE.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMVE.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer