PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 24.81% return, which is significantly higher than EXSD.DE's 11.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE has outperformed EXSD.DE with an annualized return of 14.71%, while EXSD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.


XB4A.DE

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.14%
6M
22.10%
YTD
24.81%
1Y
48.60%
3Y*
31.52%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
14.71%

EXSD.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
1.92%
6M
9.34%
YTD
11.87%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
24.81%51.29%11.01%14.27%-16.45%42.39%-10.86%19.79%-17.99%32.88%
EXSD.DE
iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE)
11.87%20.71%5.80%15.08%-18.91%18.43%0.93%29.02%-11.97%16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011

0.72

The correlation between XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB4A.DE
XB4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EXSD.DE
EXSD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EXSD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXSD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XB4A.DEEXSD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.26

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

2.12

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

7.53

+7.53

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the EXSD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, smaller than the maximum EXSD.DE drawdown of -61.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XB4A.DEEXSD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-61.46%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-8.81%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-14.39%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.50%

-30.21%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.54%

-39.16%

-14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.25%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-12.65%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.49%

+0.73%

Volatility

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXSD.DE) at 3.29%. This indicates that XB4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXSD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XB4A.DEEXSD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

3.29%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.88%

10.57%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

12.94%

+4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

15.66%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

16.65%

+3.50%

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EXSD.DE's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XB4A.DE vs. EXSD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXSD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXSD.DE
iShares STOXX Europe Mid 200 UCITS ETF (DE)
2.72%3.08%3.23%2.71%3.06%2.12%1.54%2.85%3.02%3.28%3.16%2.64%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXSD.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXSD.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while EXSD.DE tracks STOXX Europe Mid 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.21% for EXSD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and EXSD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer