XMTR vs. FLNC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC).

Performance

XMTR vs. FLNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XMTR vs. FLNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XMTR Xometry, Inc.	-31.33%	39.40%	18.80%	11.42%	-37.11%	-4.85%
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	-30.43%	24.56%	-33.42%	39.07%	-51.77%	1.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap XMTR : $2.08B FLNC : $1.81B
EPS XMTR : -$1.22 FLNC : -$0.31
PS Ratio XMTR : 3.02 FLNC : 0.90
PB Ratio XMTR : 7.53 FLNC : 4.66
Total Revenue (TTM) XMTR : $686.63M FLNC : $2.55B
Gross Profit (TTM) XMTR : $268.77M FLNC : $297.63M
EBITDA (TTM) XMTR : -$38.59M FLNC : -$28.21M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMTR having a -31.33% return and FLNC slightly higher at -30.43%.

XMTR

• 1D: 9.17%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: -31.33%
• 6M: -25.02%
• 1Y: 63.88%
• 3Y*: 39.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLNC

• 1D: 5.85%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: -30.43%
• 6M: 27.41%
• 1Y: 183.71%
• 3Y*: -12.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XMTR vs. FLNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMTR

XMTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XMTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XMTR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XMTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XMTR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTR vs. FLNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMTR	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	1.67	-0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.39	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.31	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	2.95	-1.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	7.26	-3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMTR vs. FLNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the FLNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTR and FLNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMTR	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	1.67	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	-0.20	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between XMTR and FLNC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XMTR vs. FLNC - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMTR nor FLNC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XMTR vs. FLNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTR drawdown since its inception was -87.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FLNC drawdown of -90.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTR and FLNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMTR	FLNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.09%	-90.40%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.93%	-59.66%	+9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.27%	-63.41%	+10.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.99%	-53.81%	-5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.58%	24.27%	-7.69%

Volatility

XMTR vs. FLNC - Volatility Comparison

Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) has a higher volatility of 24.85% compared to Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) at 22.32%. This indicates that XMTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMTR	FLNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.85%	22.32%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.97%	89.09%	-28.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.73%	110.63%	-23.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.24%	93.74%	-12.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.24%	93.74%	-12.50%

Financials

XMTR vs. FLNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xometry, Inc. and Fluence Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

XMTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 75.24M and revenue of 192.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

FLNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.05M and revenue of 475.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.

XMTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.78M and revenue of 192.40M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

FLNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -59.37M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

XMTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a net income of -8.63M and revenue of 192.40M, resulting in a net margin of -4.5%.

FLNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -45.07M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.