FLNC vs. MSFT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).

Performance

FLNC vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLNC vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	-30.43%	24.56%	-33.42%	39.07%	-51.77%	1.60%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-23.45%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	3.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FLNC : $1.81B MSFT : $2.76T
EPS FLNC : -$0.31 MSFT : $15.98
PS Ratio FLNC : 0.90 MSFT : 9.02
PB Ratio FLNC : 4.66 MSFT : 7.05
Total Revenue (TTM) FLNC : $2.55B MSFT : $305.45B
Gross Profit (TTM) FLNC : $297.63M MSFT : $209.50B
EBITDA (TTM) FLNC : -$28.21M MSFT : $191.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNC achieves a -30.43% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -23.45% return.

FLNC

• 1D: 5.85%
• 1M: -11.45%
• YTD: -30.43%
• 6M: 27.41%
• 1Y: 183.71%
• 3Y*: -12.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -7.32%
• YTD: -23.45%
• 6M: -28.63%
• 1Y: -2.61%
• 3Y*: 9.46%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 22.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLNC vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNC vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLNC	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	-0.10	+1.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	0.04	+2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.01	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	-0.03	+2.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	-0.07	+7.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLNC vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNC and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLNC	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	-0.10	+1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.73	-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between FLNC and MSFT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLNC vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

FLNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.94%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Drawdowns

FLNC vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNC drawdown since its inception was -90.40%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNC and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLNC	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.40%	-69.38%	-21.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.66%	-33.91%	-25.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.41%	-31.58%	-31.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.81%	-21.77%	-32.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.27%	12.61%	+11.66%

Volatility

FLNC vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 6.23%. This indicates that FLNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLNC	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.32%	6.23%	+16.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	89.09%	19.13%	+69.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.63%	26.44%	+84.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.74%	26.16%	+67.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.74%	26.88%	+66.86%

Financials

FLNC vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fluence Energy, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FLNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.05M and revenue of 475.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.30B and revenue of 81.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

FLNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -59.37M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.5%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.28B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.

FLNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -45.07M and revenue of 475.23M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 38.46B and revenue of 81.27B, resulting in a net margin of 47.3%.