PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLNC vs. TAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLNC and TAN is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FLNC vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.87%
-19.62%
FLNC
TAN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLNC:

-0.47

TAN:

-0.61

Sortino Ratio

FLNC:

-0.29

TAN:

-0.71

Omega Ratio

FLNC:

0.97

TAN:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

FLNC:

-0.54

TAN:

-0.28

Martin Ratio

FLNC:

-1.29

TAN:

-1.33

Ulcer Index

FLNC:

26.99%

TAN:

17.95%

Daily Std Dev

FLNC:

73.83%

TAN:

39.10%

Max Drawdown

FLNC:

-83.22%

TAN:

-95.29%

Current Drawdown

FLNC:

-63.60%

TAN:

-84.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNC achieves a -13.79% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 0.60% return.


FLNC

YTD

-13.79%

1M

-15.70%

6M

-14.86%

1Y

-31.96%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TAN

YTD

0.60%

1M

-1.86%

6M

-19.62%

1Y

-22.47%

5Y*

0.29%

10Y*

0.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLNC vs. TAN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLNC is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLNC is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLNC is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAN is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAN is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAN is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAN is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAN is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLNC vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.47-0.61
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.29-0.71
The chart of Omega ratio for FLNC, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.970.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.54-0.35
The chart of Martin ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-1.29-1.33
FLNC
TAN

The current FLNC Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the TAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNC and TAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.47
-0.61
FLNC
TAN

Dividends

FLNC vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

FLNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.50%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.70%1.77%5.04%1.60%1.88%

Drawdowns

FLNC vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNC drawdown since its inception was -83.22%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNC and TAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-63.60%
-66.66%
FLNC
TAN

Volatility

FLNC vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) at 9.93%. This indicates that FLNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
17.27%
9.93%
FLNC
TAN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab