FLNC vs. BEPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC).

Performance

FLNC vs. BEPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLNC vs. BEPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	-34.18%	24.56%	-1.55%
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	6.35%	45.18%	-3.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FLNC : $1.71B BEPC : $13.71B
EPS FLNC : -$0.31 BEPC : -$10.07
PS Ratio FLNC : 0.85 BEPC : 2.52
Total Revenue (TTM) FLNC : $2.55B BEPC : $3.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) FLNC : $297.63M BEPC : $2.23B
EBITDA (TTM) FLNC : -$28.21M BEPC : $2.12B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNC achieves a -34.18% return, which is significantly lower than BEPC's 6.35% return.

FLNC

• 1D: -5.38%
• 1M: -13.89%
• YTD: -34.18%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: 171.25%
• 3Y*: -13.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEPC

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -6.33%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 47.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLNC vs. BEPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BEPC

BEPC Risk / Return Rank: 81
BEPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BEPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BEPC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BEPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BEPC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNC vs. BEPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLNC	BEPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.42	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.03	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.30	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	7.48	-0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLNC vs. BEPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the BEPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNC and BEPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLNC	BEPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.42	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	1.12	-1.33

Correlation

The correlation between FLNC and BEPC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLNC vs. BEPC - Dividend Comparison

FLNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.

	TTM	2025
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%
BEPC Brookfield Renewable Corporation	3.74%	3.89%

Drawdowns

FLNC vs. BEPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNC drawdown since its inception was -90.40%, which is greater than BEPC's maximum drawdown of -16.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNC and BEPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLNC	BEPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.40%	-16.62%	-73.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.66%	-15.44%	-44.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.38%	-8.07%	-57.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.82%	-5.64%	-48.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.56%	6.80%	+17.76%

Volatility

FLNC vs. BEPC - Volatility Comparison

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) at 8.93%. This indicates that FLNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLNC	BEPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.88%	8.93%	+13.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	89.10%	22.48%	+66.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.74%	33.67%	+77.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.73%	33.48%	+60.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.73%	33.48%	+60.25%

Financials