PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMTR vs. PGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XMTR vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMTR achieves a 53.96% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's -3.10% return.


XMTR

1D
-1.84%
1M
2.63%
YTD
53.96%
6M
41.62%
1Y
182.16%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
10Y*

PGR

1D
1.23%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-3.10%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
-15.71%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
24.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMTR vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
53.96%39.40%18.80%11.42%-37.11%-24.63%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-3.10%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XMTR and PGR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.03

The correlation between XMTR and PGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

XMTR:

-$1.02

PGR:

$19.67

PS Ratio

XMTR:

6.31

PGR:

1.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

XMTR:

$740.80M

PGR:

$89.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XMTR:

$290.93M

PGR:

$25.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

XMTR:

-$32.96M

PGR:

$15.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMTR vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMTR
XMTR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTR vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMTRPGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.90

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

-0.66

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

-1.00

+10.36

XMTR vs. PGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the PGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTR and PGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMTR vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTR drawdown since its inception was -87.09%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTR and PGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMTRPGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.09%

-71.06%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.93%

-24.02%

-25.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.44%

-30.35%

-40.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-24.14%

+20.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.38%

-14.54%

-42.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.56%

15.72%

+3.84%

Volatility

XMTR vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) has a higher volatility of 16.90% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 7.19%. This indicates that XMTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMTRPGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.90%

7.19%

+9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.89%

16.23%

+49.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.77%

22.45%

+70.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.30%

24.54%

+58.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.30%

24.49%

+58.81%

Dividends

XMTR vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

XMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.70%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

XMTR vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xometry, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
205.14M
22.18B
(XMTR) Total Revenue
(PGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XMTR vs. PGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xometry, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
38.3%
37.7%
Portfolio components
XMTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.49M and revenue of 205.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.

PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.35B and revenue of 22.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

XMTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.22M and revenue of 205.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.5%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.57B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

XMTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xometry, Inc. reported a net income of -5.27M and revenue of 205.14M, resulting in a net margin of -2.6%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XMTR and PGR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMTR has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to PGR (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMTR dropped -87.09% vs PGR's -71.06%.

XMTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMTR and PGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer