PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMTR vs. AI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XMTR vs. AI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMTR achieves a 53.96% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -28.04% return.


XMTR

1D
-1.84%
1M
2.63%
YTD
53.96%
6M
41.62%
1Y
182.16%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
10Y*

AI

1D
-5.83%
1M
4.41%
YTD
-28.04%
6M
-33.65%
1Y
-58.90%
3Y*
-33.77%
5Y*
-30.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMTR vs. AI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
53.96%39.40%18.80%11.42%-37.11%-24.63%
AI
C3.ai, Inc.
-28.04%-60.85%19.92%156.57%-64.19%-51.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XMTR and AI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XMTR:

$4.75B

AI:

$1.42B

EPS

XMTR:

-$1.02

AI:

-$3.37

PS Ratio

XMTR:

6.31

AI:

5.42

PB Ratio

XMTR:

16.85

AI:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

XMTR:

$740.80M

AI:

$250.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XMTR:

$290.93M

AI:

$77.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

XMTR:

-$32.96M

AI:

-$461.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMTR vs. AI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMTR
XMTR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AI
AI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMTR vs. AI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMTRAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.83

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

-0.80

+4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

-1.12

+10.47

XMTR vs. AI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the AI Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMTR and AI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMTR vs. AI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMTR drawdown since its inception was -87.09%, smaller than the maximum AI drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMTR and AI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMTRAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.09%

-95.63%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.93%

-73.39%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.44%

-82.51%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-94.53%

+90.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.38%

-81.97%

+24.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.56%

52.73%

-33.17%

Volatility

XMTR vs. AI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) is 16.90%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 18.04%. This indicates that XMTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMTRAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.90%

18.04%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.89%

48.17%

+17.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.77%

65.65%

+27.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.30%

77.68%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.30%

81.99%

+1.31%

Dividends

XMTR vs. AI - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMTR nor AI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

XMTR vs. AI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xometry, Inc. and C3.ai, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
205.14M
51.60M
(XMTR) Total Revenue
(AI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XMTR and AI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AI has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to XMTR (16.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMTR dropped -87.09% vs AI's -95.63%.

XMTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMTR and AI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer