XMPT vs. NEA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) is High Yield Muni fund tracking the S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index, while NEA (Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XMPT returned 1.94%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for NEA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMPT charges 1.97%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for NEA.

Performance

XMPT vs. NEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than NEA's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XMPT has underperformed NEA with an annualized return of 1.94%, while NEA has yielded a comparatively higher 2.97% annualized return.

XMPT

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: -1.17%
• 10Y*: 1.94%

NEA

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 9.40%
• 5Y*: -0.08%
• 10Y*: 2.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMPT vs. NEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	2.34%	8.01%	7.01%	2.55%	-24.02%	7.94%	7.70%	20.36%	-5.85%	8.28%
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund	1.73%	11.31%	9.50%	0.75%	-23.32%	8.16%	10.07%	22.42%	-5.72%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XMPT and NEA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011	0.68

The correlation between XMPT and NEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMPT vs. NEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMPT

XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 47
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

NEA

NEA Risk / Return Rank: 78
NEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
NEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NEA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
NEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
NEA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMPT vs. NEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMPT	NEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.39	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.08	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.02	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	8.11	-0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMPT vs. NEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the NEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMPT and NEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMPT	NEA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.39	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.01	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.25	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.32	+0.10

Drawdowns

XMPT vs. NEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, smaller than the maximum NEA drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and NEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMPT	NEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.24%	-43.83%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-7.27%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.04%	-15.16%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.24%	-36.57%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.24%	-36.57%	+1.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.94%	-5.41%	-3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-8.01%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.81%	-0.21%

Volatility

XMPT vs. NEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is 2.69%, while Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that XMPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMPT	NEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	3.80%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.03%	8.50%	-2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.21%	10.59%	-3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.35%	11.49%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	11.81%	-1.45%

XMPT vs. NEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NEA's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMPT vs. NEA - Dividend Comparison

XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, less than NEA's 7.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund	7.23%	7.36%	6.63%	3.95%	5.49%	4.50%	4.45%	4.46%	5.40%	5.33%	5.70%	5.71%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	6.34%	5.87%	5.35%	3.81%	5.12%	3.74%	3.79%	4.08%	5.05%	4.84%	5.35%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMPT and NEA in my portfolio?

XMPT and NEA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMPT or NEA?

NEA has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to XMPT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMPT dropped -35.24% vs NEA's -43.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.