PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEA vs. NVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

NEA vs. NVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEA vs. NVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
-0.17%11.31%9.50%0.75%-23.32%8.16%10.07%22.42%-5.72%8.77%
NVG
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
0.63%11.61%10.79%1.94%-28.47%12.14%6.40%25.63%-4.03%13.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEA:

$3.41B

NVG:

$2.67B

EPS

NEA:

$2.18

NVG:

$2.87

PE Ratio

NEA:

5.22

NVG:

4.36

PEG Ratio

NEA:

0.02

NVG:

0.01

PS Ratio

NEA:

4.14

NVG:

6.04

PB Ratio

NEA:

0.97

NVG:

0.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEA:

$824.80M

NVG:

$442.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEA:

$779.17M

NVG:

$398.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

NEA:

$732.48M

NVG:

$645.87M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEA achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than NVG's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NEA has underperformed NVG with an annualized return of 3.17%, while NVG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.89% annualized return.


NEA

1D
1.60%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
3.40%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
3.17%

NVG

1D
1.46%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
0.63%
6M
4.53%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
3.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEA vs. NVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEA
NEA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NVG
NVG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEA vs. NVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEANVGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.09

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.87

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.81

2.85

+1.96

NEA vs. NVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the NVG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEA and NVG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEANVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.01

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.30

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.39

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between NEA and NVG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NEA vs. NVG - Dividend Comparison

NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than NVG's 7.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.37%7.36%6.63%3.95%5.49%4.50%4.45%4.46%5.40%5.33%5.70%5.71%
NVG
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.58%7.49%6.74%4.45%6.18%4.69%5.24%4.94%6.07%5.67%6.17%5.46%

Drawdowns

NEA vs. NVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEA drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than NVG's maximum drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEA and NVG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEANVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-41.72%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-10.44%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-40.58%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.57%

-40.58%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-9.26%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-7.92%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.20%

-1.17%

Volatility

NEA vs. NVG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEANVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.39%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.51%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

11.64%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

12.90%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.68%

12.80%

-1.12%

Financials

NEA vs. NVG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund and Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
102.66M
102.36M
(NEA) Total Revenue
(NVG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items