XMPT vs. FMHI
XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) and FMHI (First Trust Municipal High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMPT is a High Yield Muni fund tracking the S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index, while FMHI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. XMPT is passively managed, while FMHI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMPT returned -1.14%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for FMHI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMPT charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FMHI.
Performance
XMPT vs. FMHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than FMHI's 2.68% return.
XMPT
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 11.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- -1.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
FMHI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XMPT vs. FMHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 2.48% | 8.01% | 7.01% | 2.55% | -24.02% | 7.94% | 7.70% | 20.36% | -5.85% | 1.04% |
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF | 2.68% | 3.54% | 5.41% | 7.20% | -14.67% | 7.58% | 4.09% | 10.34% | 2.50% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMPT and FMHI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.45 |
The correlation between XMPT and FMHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMPT vs. FMHI — Risk / Return Rank
XMPT
FMHI
XMPT vs. FMHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMPT | FMHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.61 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.63 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | 13.66 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMPT | FMHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.75 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.19 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
XMPT vs. FMHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than FMHI's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and FMHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMPT | FMHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | -18.83% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -2.35% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | -6.17% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.24% | -18.83% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | 0.00% | -8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -4.52% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 0.62% | +0.99% |
Volatility
XMPT vs. FMHI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) at 0.96%. This indicates that XMPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMPT | FMHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 0.96% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | 2.10% | +3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.21% | 3.12% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.35% | 4.76% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 5.73% | +4.63% |
XMPT vs. FMHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FMHI's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMPT vs. FMHI - Dividend Comparison
XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than FMHI's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMHI First Trust Municipal High Income ETF | 4.24% | 4.16% | 4.01% | 3.89% | 3.57% | 2.87% | 3.13% | 3.33% | 3.46% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 6.33% | 5.87% | 5.35% | 3.81% | 5.12% | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.08% | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.35% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMPT and FMHI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMPT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FMHI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMPT dropped -35.24% vs FMHI's -18.83%.
On 5-year performance, FMHI leads with 0.91% vs -1.14% for XMPT. On fees, FMHI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FMHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FMHI has performed better with a 0.91% return vs -1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMHI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.
XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 4.24% for FMHI.
XMPT is categorized as High Yield Muni, while FMHI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.97% for XMPT and 0.55% for FMHI.
FMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMPT and FMHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer