PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NEA vs. MUB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NEA and MUB is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

NEA vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.12%
0.27%
NEA
MUB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NEA:

1.58

MUB:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

NEA:

2.18

MUB:

0.78

Omega Ratio

NEA:

1.29

MUB:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

NEA:

0.52

MUB:

0.45

Martin Ratio

NEA:

5.87

MUB:

2.01

Ulcer Index

NEA:

2.23%

MUB:

1.03%

Daily Std Dev

NEA:

8.31%

MUB:

3.75%

Max Drawdown

NEA:

-43.83%

MUB:

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

NEA:

-13.61%

MUB:

-1.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEA achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NEA has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 3.49%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.


NEA

YTD

3.42%

1M

3.60%

6M

3.13%

1Y

12.90%

5Y*

0.13%

10Y*

3.49%

MUB

YTD

0.29%

1M

1.15%

6M

0.27%

1Y

1.83%

5Y*

0.76%

10Y*

2.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NEA vs. MUB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEA is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEA is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEA is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEA is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEA is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUB is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUB is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUB is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUB is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUB is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUB is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NEA vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NEA, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.580.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for NEA, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.180.78
The chart of Omega ratio for NEA, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.291.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for NEA, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.520.45
The chart of Martin ratio for NEA, currently valued at 5.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.872.01
NEA
MUB

The current NEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEA and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.58
0.55
NEA
MUB

Dividends

NEA vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than MUB's 3.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.71%6.63%3.95%5.49%4.50%4.45%4.46%5.40%5.33%5.70%5.71%5.95%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.02%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%2.73%

Drawdowns

NEA vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEA drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEA and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.61%
-1.31%
NEA
MUB

Volatility

NEA vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 1.09%. This indicates that NEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.91%
1.09%
NEA
MUB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab