PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEA vs. USAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEA vs. USAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEA vs. USAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
-0.17%11.31%9.50%0.75%-23.32%8.16%10.07%22.42%-5.72%8.77%
USAUX
USAA Aggressive Growth Fund
-9.21%16.98%33.63%48.36%-35.30%16.68%41.82%23.23%-0.75%30.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEA achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than USAUX's -9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NEA has underperformed USAUX with an annualized return of 3.17%, while USAUX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.


NEA

1D
1.60%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
3.40%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
3.17%

USAUX

1D
3.94%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
-9.21%
6M
-9.92%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEA vs. USAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEA
NEA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

USAUX
USAUX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEA vs. USAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) and USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEAUSAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.84

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.81

3.76

+1.05

NEA vs. USAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the USAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEA and USAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEAUSAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.84

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.39

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.61

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.42

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between NEA and USAUX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NEA vs. USAUX - Dividend Comparison

NEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than USAUX's 4.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEA
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.37%7.36%6.63%3.95%5.49%4.50%4.45%4.46%5.40%5.33%5.70%5.71%
USAUX
USAA Aggressive Growth Fund
4.88%4.43%5.15%0.00%2.37%11.36%0.18%20.25%18.58%9.19%7.42%6.80%

Drawdowns

NEA vs. USAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEA drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, smaller than the maximum USAUX drawdown of -76.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEA and USAUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAUSAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-76.19%

+32.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-17.09%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-43.84%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.57%

-43.84%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-13.82%

+6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-26.80%

+18.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

5.11%

-3.08%

Volatility

NEA vs. USAUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) is 5.19%, while USAA Aggressive Growth Fund (USAUX) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that NEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEAUSAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

7.08%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

13.11%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

23.03%

-11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

24.49%

-13.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.68%

22.81%

-11.13%