PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XMPT vs. FLMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XMPTFLMI
YTD Return9.92%4.87%
1Y Return18.64%10.42%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.76%0.70%
5Y Return (Ann)0.29%2.33%
Sharpe Ratio2.682.47
Sortino Ratio4.093.74
Omega Ratio1.501.53
Calmar Ratio0.721.30
Martin Ratio14.4818.45
Ulcer Index1.42%0.59%
Daily Std Dev7.65%4.39%
Max Drawdown-35.24%-14.66%
Current Drawdown-15.38%-1.27%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between XMPT and FLMI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

XMPT vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than FLMI's 4.87% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.54%
2.87%
XMPT
FLMI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMPT vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMPT has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.


XMPT
VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for XMPT: current value at 1.86% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.86%
Expense ratio chart for FLMI: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XMPT vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMPT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XMPT, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XMPT, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XMPT, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XMPT, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XMPT, currently valued at 14.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.48
FLMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 3.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.74
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLMI, currently valued at 18.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.45

XMPT vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMPT and FLMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.68
2.47
XMPT
FLMI

Dividends

XMPT vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than FLMI's 4.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XMPT
VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF
4.87%3.81%5.12%3.74%3.80%4.08%5.05%4.84%5.37%5.24%5.50%6.17%
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
4.05%3.71%3.09%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XMPT vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and FLMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-15.38%
-1.27%
XMPT
FLMI

Volatility

XMPT vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 1.89%. This indicates that XMPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.05%
1.89%
XMPT
FLMI