XMPT vs. LDSF
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF).
XMPT and LDSF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMPT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2011. LDSF is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jan 3, 2019.
Performance
XMPT vs. LDSF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMPT vs. LDSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | -0.80% | 8.01% | 7.01% | 2.55% | -24.02% | 7.94% | 7.70% | 16.79% |
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | -0.07% | 6.82% | 4.20% | 6.53% | -5.47% | -0.28% | 2.48% | 4.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than LDSF's -0.07% return.
XMPT
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
LDSF
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMPT vs. LDSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than LDSF's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMPT vs. LDSF — Risk / Return Rank
XMPT
LDSF
XMPT vs. LDSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMPT | LDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 2.09 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | 2.93 | -2.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.45 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.95 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 12.81 | -10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMPT | LDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.09 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.76 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.79 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMPT and LDSF is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XMPT vs. LDSF - Dividend Comparison
XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than LDSF's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 5.92% | 5.87% | 5.35% | 3.81% | 5.12% | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.08% | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.35% | 5.24% |
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 4.61% | 4.52% | 4.53% | 4.08% | 2.61% | 1.97% | 2.65% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMPT vs. LDSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than LDSF's maximum drawdown of -8.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and LDSF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMPT | LDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | -8.56% | -26.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -1.74% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.24% | -7.83% | -27.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -1.07% | -10.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -1.48% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 0.40% | +1.80% |
Volatility
XMPT vs. LDSF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) at 1.17%. This indicates that XMPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMPT | LDSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 1.17% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 1.48% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 2.39% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 3.08% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.33% | 3.20% | +7.13% |