XMMO vs. MGK
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for MGK. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
XMMO vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed MGK with an annualized return of 19.95%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively lower 18.85% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 37.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
XMMO vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and MGK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XMMO and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
MGK
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
MGK
Technology
XMMO
MGK
Basic Materials
XMMO
MGK
Energy
XMMO
MGK
-
Healthcare
XMMO
MGK
Real Estate
XMMO
MGK
Utilities
XMMO
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
MGK
Financial Services
XMMO
MGK
Communication Services
XMMO
MGK
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
MGK
XMMO vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 1.37 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 4.65 | +12.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -48.43% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -16.85% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -23.36% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -36.01% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -36.01% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -5.63% | +4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -7.58% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.97% | -2.88% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 5.96% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 13.29% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 16.87% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 22.72% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 21.93% | +0.42% |
XMMO vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and MGK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 18.85% for MGK. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 18.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.05% for MGK.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer