PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. SPGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. SPGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPGP's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed SPGP with an annualized return of 20.42%, while SPGP has yielded a comparatively lower 15.41% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
1.31%
1M
5.63%
YTD
25.95%
6M
23.04%
1Y
40.85%
3Y*
32.12%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
20.42%

SPGP

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.56%
YTD
5.80%
6M
3.85%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. SPGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
25.95%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
5.80%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and SPGP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.78

The correlation between XMMO and SPGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. SPGP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
SPGP

Industrials

41.5%
16.9%

Technology

19.2%
24.9%

Basic Materials

6.9%

-

Energy

6.5%
6.3%

Healthcare

6.3%
3.7%

Utilities

5.6%

-

Real Estate

5.4%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%

-

Financial Services

2.5%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
17.6%

Communication Services

1.3%
6.8%

Industrials

XMMO
41.5%
SPGP
16.9%

Technology

XMMO
19.2%
SPGP
24.9%

Basic Materials

XMMO
6.9%
SPGP

-

Energy

XMMO
6.5%
SPGP
6.3%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
SPGP
3.7%

Utilities

XMMO
5.6%
SPGP

-

Real Estate

XMMO
5.4%
SPGP
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
2.7%
SPGP

-

Financial Services

XMMO
2.5%
SPGP
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
2.2%
SPGP
17.6%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.3%
SPGP
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. SPGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. SPGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOSPGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

1.50

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

5.70

+13.85

XMMO vs. SPGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the SPGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and SPGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. SPGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SPGP's maximum drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SPGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOSPGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-42.08%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-11.15%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.87%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-22.87%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-42.08%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.30%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-4.35%

-5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.92%

-0.83%

Volatility

XMMO vs. SPGP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) at 5.39%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOSPGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

5.39%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.60%

12.33%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

15.79%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

18.62%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

21.25%

+1.10%

XMMO vs. SPGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. SPGP - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SPGP's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
1.13%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.74%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and SPGP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to SPGP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SPGP's -42.08%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 20.42% vs 15.41% for SPGP. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 15.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.74% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while SPGP is Multi-factor. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.36% for SPGP.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and SPGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer