PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. SPGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. SPGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPGP's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed SPGP with an annualized return of 18.04%, while SPGP has yielded a comparatively lower 15.12% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.22%
1M
-5.42%
6M
10.34%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
18.04%
ALL TIME*
12.11%

SPGP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.78%
6M
9.37%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
15.12%
ALL TIME*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.85M$11.53M$9.19M
$60.32M$71.93M$66.65M

XMMO vs. SPGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
11.79%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
10.71%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and SPGP is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.77

The correlation between XMMO and SPGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. SPGP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
SPGP

Industrials

37.0%
10.0%

Technology

12.9%
22.6%

Basic Materials

10.2%
1.6%

Energy

8.4%
1.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
9.8%

Real Estate

7.2%
2.9%

Utilities

6.0%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
12.8%

Financial Services

2.9%
30.5%

Communication Services

1.7%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
1.0%

Industrials

XMMO
37.0%
SPGP
10.0%

Technology

XMMO
12.9%
SPGP
22.6%

Basic Materials

XMMO
10.2%
SPGP
1.6%

Energy

XMMO
8.4%
SPGP
1.2%

Healthcare

XMMO
8.1%
SPGP
9.8%

Real Estate

XMMO
7.2%
SPGP
2.9%

Utilities

XMMO
6.0%
SPGP
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
5.0%
SPGP
12.8%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.9%
SPGP
30.5%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.7%
SPGP
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
SPGP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. SPGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMMO vs. SPGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOSPGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

5.55

+0.27

XMMO vs. SPGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the SPGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and SPGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. SPGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SPGP's maximum drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SPGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOSPGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-42.08%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-11.15%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.87%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-22.87%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-42.08%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.24%

-0.44%

-10.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-4.32%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.91%

+0.38%

Volatility

XMMO vs. SPGP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) at 3.74%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOSPGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

3.74%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

12.26%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

15.82%

+5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

18.64%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

21.21%

+1.22%

XMMO vs. SPGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. SPGP - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SPGP's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.80%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.63%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and SPGP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SPGP's -42.08%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.04% vs 15.12% for SPGP. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 15.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.63% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while SPGP is Multi-factor. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and SPGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer