XMMO vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
XMMO and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both XMMO and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMMO or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
| XMMO | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.11% | 17.06% |
| 1Y Return | 49.86% | 42.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.94% | 10.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.38% | 16.90% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.69% | 12.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.84 | 2.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.36% | 16.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.37% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.83% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and XMHQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.11% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 14.69%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than XMHQ's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.46% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.62% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMMO vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) at 4.33%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.