XMMO vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index while EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.73%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for EEMO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

XMMO vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 23.73% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 19.73%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and EEMO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012	0.46

The correlation between XMMO and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMMO	EEMO
Industrials	41.1%	11.5%
Technology	16.7%	43.8%
Energy	7.7%	2.5%
Basic Materials	7.2%	12.9%
Healthcare	6.3%	3.0%
Real Estate	6.1%	0.5%
Utilities	5.8%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	3.2%
Financial Services	2.4%	18.0%
Communication Services	1.6%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	1.2%

Return for Risk

XMMO vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMMO	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.36	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.28	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	3.91	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	15.67	+2.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMMO vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMMO	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.36	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.37	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.41	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.13	+0.44

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMMO	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-48.47%	-6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-14.75%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	-26.06%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.91%	-34.03%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.74%	-46.57%	+9.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.32%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.45%	-20.17%	+10.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.67%	-1.63%

Volatility

XMMO vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.82%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMMO	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.82%	14.32%	-6.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	22.10%	-6.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	24.45%	-5.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.45%	19.33%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.27%	21.59%	+0.68%

XMMO vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMMO vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMMO and EEMO in my portfolio?

XMMO and EEMO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMMO or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, XMMO or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 8.88% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMMO or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMMO or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMMO or EEMO?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between XMMO and EEMO?

XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.