XME vs. WOOD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both Materials funds - XME tracks the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index while WOOD tracks the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 14.85%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for WOOD. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.

Performance

XME vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than WOOD's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed WOOD with an annualized return of 14.85%, while WOOD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.04% annualized return.

XME

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -4.26%
• 6M: -15.11%
• YTD: -2.73%
• 1Y: 39.51%
• 3Y*: 24.33%
• 5Y*: 18.53%
• 10Y*: 14.85%
• ALL TIME*: 5.47%

WOOD

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 7.81%
• 6M: -2.77%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.37%
• 3Y*: 0.18%
• 5Y*: -2.02%
• 10Y*: 6.04%
• ALL TIME*: 4.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	$922.15K	$727.96K	$1.06M
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	$205.06M	$204.83M	$245.34M

XME vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	-2.73%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	21.17%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	0.84%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and WOOD is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008	0.63

The correlation between XME and WOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XME vs. WOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XME	WOOD
Basic Materials	75.3%	65.3%
Energy	23.5%	-
Technology	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	22.5%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	12.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XME vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 39
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 34

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 15
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XME vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XME	WOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.21	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	0.44	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.05	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	0.18	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.22	0.34	+2.88

XME vs. WOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the WOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and WOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XME vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than WOOD's maximum drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and WOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	WOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-63.25%	-22.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.49%	-21.64%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-22.79%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-30.71%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	-50.20%	-11.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.17%	-17.97%	-6.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-14.83%	-29.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.77%	11.43%	+0.34%

Volatility

XME vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) at 5.30%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	WOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	5.30%	+5.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.52%	14.61%	+13.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.88%	18.65%	+18.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.70%	19.74%	+12.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.88%	21.74%	+11.14%

XME vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

XME vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than WOOD's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.34%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.37%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and WOOD in my portfolio?

XME and WOOD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or WOOD?

XME has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to WOOD (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs WOOD's -63.25%.

Which ETF is better, XME or WOOD?

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 14.85% vs 6.04% for WOOD. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XME or WOOD?

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XME or WOOD?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XME or WOOD?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.37% for XME.

What is the main difference between XME and WOOD?

XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.46% for WOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.