PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 19.09%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.05% annualized return.


XME

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
14.53%
6M
20.99%
1Y
84.92%
3Y*
35.78%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
19.09%

VIG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.32%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.47%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
14.53%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.58%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and VIG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.58

The correlation between XME and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
VIG

Basic Materials

75.3%
3.5%

Energy

23.4%
3.5%

Technology

2.2%
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
10.1%

Industrials

0.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Basic Materials

XME
75.3%
VIG
3.5%

Energy

XME
23.4%
VIG
3.5%

Technology

XME
2.2%
VIG
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.8%
VIG
10.1%

Industrials

XME
0.4%
VIG
11.8%

Communication Services

XME

-

VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

VIG
4.7%

Financial Services

XME

-

VIG
20.6%

Healthcare

XME

-

VIG
16.5%

Real Estate

XME

-

VIG

-

Utilities

XME

-

VIG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.33

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

9.37

+0.18

XME vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.82

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.75

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.60

-0.43

Drawdowns

XME vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-46.81%

-39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-7.91%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-14.95%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-20.39%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-31.72%

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-1.34%

-9.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.12%

-5.51%

-38.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

1.96%

+6.96%

Volatility

XME vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.42%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

2.42%

+11.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.83%

7.68%

+20.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.60%

10.10%

+25.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.72%

14.24%

+18.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.91%

16.06%

+16.85%

XME vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VIG's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and VIG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to VIG (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.09% vs 13.05% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.09% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while VIG is Dividend. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.04% for VIG.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer