XME vs. RING

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).

XME and RING are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XME is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both XME and RING are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XME vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XME vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	4.31%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	21.17%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	7.25%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 19.54%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 17.97% annualized return.

XME

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -9.45%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: 93.75%
• 3Y*: 27.50%
• 5Y*: 22.88%
• 10Y*: 19.54%

RING

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -20.56%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 22.69%
• 1Y: 108.05%
• 3Y*: 48.58%
• 5Y*: 24.99%
• 10Y*: 17.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

RING

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

XME

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

Return for Risk

XME vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 94
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 91

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 93
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XME	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.33	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.52	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	3.64	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	13.06	-1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XME vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XME	RING	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.33	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.70	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.49	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.12	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between XME and RING is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XME vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than RING's 0.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.35%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.78%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Drawdowns

XME vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-79.47%	-6.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-30.11%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-47.94%	+10.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	-52.04%	-9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.77%	-20.56%	+2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.45%	-47.75%	+3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.87%	8.38%	-0.51%

Volatility

XME vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 11.55%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 18.16%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.55%	18.16%	-6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.02%	38.56%	-10.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.81%	46.62%	-10.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.46%	35.85%	-3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.98%	36.85%	-3.87%