PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. IYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. IYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 12.63%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.


XLY

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
12.63%

IYC

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-2.36%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-1.60%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-2.36%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and IYC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2000

0.94

The correlation between XLY and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLY vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
IYC

Consumer Cyclical

97.5%
67.8%

Communication Services

1.4%
13.7%

Technology

0.9%
3.6%

Industrials

0.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

11.2%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.5%
IYC
67.8%

Communication Services

XLY
1.4%
IYC
13.7%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
IYC
3.6%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
IYC
3.5%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

IYC

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

IYC
11.2%

Energy

XLY

-

IYC
0.1%

Financial Services

XLY

-

IYC

-

Healthcare

XLY

-

IYC

-

Real Estate

XLY

-

IYC

-

Utilities

XLY

-

IYC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYIYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.05

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.32

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

0.96

+1.15

XLY vs. IYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the IYC Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and IYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYIYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.27

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.31

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Drawdowns

XLY vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and IYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYIYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-53.10%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-11.97%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-21.62%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-35.90%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-35.90%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-6.05%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-9.95%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

3.97%

+0.79%

Volatility

XLY vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 3.99%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYIYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.99%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

10.51%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

14.32%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

20.72%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

19.89%

+2.16%

XLY vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.76%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XLY and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLY has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to IYC (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs IYC's -53.10%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.63% vs 11.52% for IYC. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.63% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.38% for IYC.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and IYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer