XLY vs. IYC
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - XLY tracks the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.63%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for IYC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
XLY vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 12.63%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
IYC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
XLY vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -1.60% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.36% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and IYC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2000 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XLY and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLY vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
IYC
Communication Services
XLY
IYC
Technology
XLY
IYC
Industrials
XLY
IYC
Basic Materials
XLY
-
IYC
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
IYC
Energy
XLY
-
IYC
Financial Services
XLY
-
IYC
-
Healthcare
XLY
-
IYC
-
Real Estate
XLY
-
IYC
-
Utilities
XLY
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
IYC
XLY vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.32 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 0.96 | +1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.27 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
XLY vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -53.10% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -11.97% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -21.62% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -35.90% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -35.90% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -6.05% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -9.95% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 3.97% | +0.79% |
Volatility
XLY vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 3.99%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 3.99% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 10.51% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 14.32% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 20.72% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 19.89% | +2.16% |
XLY vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XLY and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLY has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to IYC (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.63% vs 11.52% for IYC. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.63% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.
XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.
XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.38% for IYC.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer