XLY vs. ESPO
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLY returned 7.00%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
XLY vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | -9.97% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and ESPO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XLY and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLY vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
ESPO
Communication Services
XLY
ESPO
Technology
XLY
ESPO
Industrials
XLY
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Energy
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Financial Services
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
XLY
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
ESPO
XLY vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.88 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | -0.54 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | -0.94 | +2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLY vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -50.99% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -27.81% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -27.81% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -48.33% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -27.19% | +21.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -15.06% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 15.95% | -11.07% |
Volatility
XLY vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 4.42% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 14.67% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 18.83% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 25.10% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 25.71% | -3.63% |
XLY vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and ESPO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, XLY leads with 7.00% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLY has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.55% for ESPO.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer