PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.


XLY

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.78%

ESPO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-15.10%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-14.92%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.16%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%-9.97%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-15.10%25.79%47.61%33.64%-34.71%-2.13%83.93%42.36%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and ESPO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.66

The correlation between XLY and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLY vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
ESPO

Consumer Cyclical

97.6%
13.8%

Communication Services

1.3%
78.1%

Technology

0.9%
8.2%

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.6%
ESPO
13.8%

Communication Services

XLY
1.3%
ESPO
78.1%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
ESPO
8.2%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
ESPO

-

Basic Materials

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Energy

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Financial Services

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Healthcare

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Real Estate

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Utilities

XLY

-

ESPO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLYESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.88

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.54

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

-0.94

+2.99

XLY vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLY vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-50.99%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-27.81%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-27.81%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-48.33%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-27.19%

+21.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-15.06%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

15.95%

-11.07%

Volatility

XLY vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

4.42%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

14.67%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

18.83%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

25.10%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

25.71%

-3.63%

XLY vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.47%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and ESPO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

On 5-year performance, XLY leads with 7.00% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLY has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.55% for ESPO.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer