FMED vs. INDEX
FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) and INDEX (Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight) are both funds - FMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while INDEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FMED returned 4.49% vs 29.43% for INDEX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMED charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for INDEX.
Performance
FMED vs. INDEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMED achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly lower than INDEX's 11.39% return.
FMED
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -12.64%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDEX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 29.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
FMED vs. INDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | -9.30% | 9.69% | 2.29% | -4.20% |
INDEX Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight | 11.39% | 17.77% | 24.73% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMED and INDEX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FMED and INDEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMED vs. INDEX — Risk / Return Rank
FMED
INDEX
FMED vs. INDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMED | INDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 2.55 | -2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 3.46 | -2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.46 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 3.36 | -3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 15.77 | -15.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMED | INDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.55 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.63 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
FMED vs. INDEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMED drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum INDEX drawdown of -38.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMED and INDEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMED | INDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.84% | -38.82% | +16.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.33% | -8.93% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.91% | 0.00% | -14.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -4.63% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 1.90% | +6.00% |
Volatility
FMED vs. INDEX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight (INDEX) at 2.83%. This indicates that FMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMED | INDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.83% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 8.97% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 11.83% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 16.76% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 18.65% | -0.26% |
FMED vs. INDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMED has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than INDEX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMED vs. INDEX - Dividend Comparison
FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDEX Index Funds S&P 500 Equal Weight | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 3.25% | 1.81% | 1.53% | 1.61% | 3.09% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMED and INDEX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMED has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to INDEX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMED dropped -21.84% vs INDEX's -38.82%.
INDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMED and INDEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer