FMED vs. XMMO
FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. FMED is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past year, FMED returned 4.49% vs 37.37% for XMMO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMED charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
FMED vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMED achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.96% return.
FMED
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -12.64%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 22.96%
- 6M
- 24.84%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.81%
- 10Y*
- 19.66%
FMED vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | -9.30% | 9.69% | 2.29% | -4.20% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.96% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMED and XMMO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FMED and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMED vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMED
XMMO
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
FMED
XMMO
Technology
FMED
XMMO
Basic Materials
FMED
-
XMMO
Communication Services
FMED
-
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
FMED
-
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
FMED
-
XMMO
Energy
FMED
-
XMMO
Financial Services
FMED
-
XMMO
Industrials
FMED
-
XMMO
Real Estate
FMED
-
XMMO
Utilities
FMED
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMED vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
FMED
XMMO
FMED vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMED | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 2.01 | -1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 2.80 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 4.53 | -4.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 18.56 | -17.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMED | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.01 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.57 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
FMED vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMED drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMED and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMED | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.84% | -55.37% | +33.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.33% | -8.34% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.91% | 0.00% | -14.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -9.45% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 2.04% | +5.86% |
Volatility
FMED vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) is 5.65%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMED | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 7.82% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 15.59% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 18.71% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 21.45% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 22.27% | -3.88% |
FMED vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMED has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMED vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMED and XMMO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FMED (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMED dropped -21.84% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 1-year performance, XMMO leads with 37.37% vs 4.49% for FMED. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FMED has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 37.37% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FMED.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for FMED.
FMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMED and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMED and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer