XLVI vs. FBTU.L
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and FBTU.L (First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while FBTU.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FBTU.L.
Performance
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FBTU.L's 4.21% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.67% | 12.79% |
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | 4.21% | 24.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and FBTU.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.46 |
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
FBTU.L
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
FBTU.L
-
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Energy
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Healthcare
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
Industrials
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Real Estate
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Technology
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Utilities
XLVI
-
FBTU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. FBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
FBTU.L
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLVI | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.24 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum FBTU.L drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and FBTU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -33.73% | +25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -2.49% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -13.12% | +11.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.32% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 20.90% | -9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 20.83% | -9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 21.31% | -10.37% |
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. FBTU.L - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, while FBTU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.53% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and FBTU.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FBTU.L.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBTU.L is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.60% for FBTU.L.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and FBTU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer