FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L).
FBTU.L and CSKR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTU.L is managed by First Trust. CSKR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010.
Performance
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | -5.44% | 25.95% | 4.74% | 3.91% | -5.96% | -3.77% | 3.88% |
CSKR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.22% | 99.44% | -22.66% | 19.75% | -28.52% | -8.24% | 66.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTU.L achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than CSKR.L's 31.22% return.
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CSKR.L
- 1D
- 10.13%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- 31.22%
- 6M
- 62.22%
- 1Y
- 143.28%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CSKR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FBTU.L
CSKR.L
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTU.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 4.28 | -3.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 4.55 | -3.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.65 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 6.24 | -4.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 25.15 | -21.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTU.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 4.28 | -3.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTU.L and CSKR.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTU.L nor CSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum CSKR.L drawdown of -50.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and CSKR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTU.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -50.88% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -23.16% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -49.26% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.52% | -15.38% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -21.80% | +8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 5.75% | -0.75% |
Volatility
FBTU.L vs. CSKR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) is 7.43%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that FBTU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTU.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 17.75% | -10.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 28.78% | -13.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 33.34% | -10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 26.96% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 28.38% | -7.13% |