XLVI vs. CMDY
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. XLVI is actively managed, while CMDY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
XLVI vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 25.44% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 6M
- 24.53%
- 1Y
- 37.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.67% | 12.79% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.44% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and CMDY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.13 |
XLVI vs. CMDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
CMDY
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
CMDY
-
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
CMDY
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Energy
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Healthcare
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Industrials
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Real Estate
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Technology
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Utilities
XLVI
-
CMDY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
CMDY
XLVI vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLVI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.56 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -31.19% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -3.97% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -13.14% | +11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 16.06% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 15.80% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 14.63% | -3.69% |
XLVI vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, more than CMDY's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.28% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.53% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and CMDY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 10.28% for CMDY.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.28% for CMDY.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer