PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMDY vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMDY vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDY achieves a 25.44% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


CMDY

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
25.44%
6M
24.53%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMDY vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
25.44%15.81%5.43%-9.33%14.55%26.38%1.15%4.96%-11.11%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CMDY and COMT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018

0.79

The correlation between CMDY and COMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CMDY vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CMDY
COMT

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

CMDY
100.0%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Energy

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Financial Services

CMDY

-

COMT
100.0%

Healthcare

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Industrials

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Real Estate

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Technology

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Utilities

CMDY

-

COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMDY vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDY vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMDYCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

5.95

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

14.11

+0.39

CMDY vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDY Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDY and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMDYCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.24

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.64

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.20

+0.35

Drawdowns

CMDY vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDY drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDY and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMDYCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-51.89%

+20.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-8.02%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-13.31%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-29.00%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-4.82%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-24.07%

+10.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.38%

-0.81%

Volatility

CMDY vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is 5.04%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that CMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMDYCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

7.37%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

18.80%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

21.29%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

21.06%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

18.89%

-4.26%

CMDY vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMDY vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.28%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMDY and COMT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to CMDY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMDY dropped -31.19% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 10.71% for CMDY. On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.28%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.

Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CMDY and 0.48% for COMT.

CMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMDY and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer