CMDY vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
CMDY and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMDY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both CMDY and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMDY or QQQ.
Performance
CMDY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMDY achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.78% return.
CMDY
2.27%
-2.14%
-6.21%
-0.06%
7.20%
N/A
QQQ
21.78%
1.15%
10.25%
29.54%
20.42%
17.95%
Key characteristics
| CMDY | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.11 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.08 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.99 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.05 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.25 | 7.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.81% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.14% | 17.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.20% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.29% | -3.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMDY vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMDY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CMDY and QQQ is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMDY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMDY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than QQQ's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 4.98% | 5.09% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.14% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
CMDY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMDY drawdown since its inception was -31.20%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDY and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMDY vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is 3.63%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that CMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.