PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 9.14%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


XLU

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
3.91%
6M
3.83%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
9.14%

VUG

1D
1.77%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
4.80%
6M
3.81%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.91%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
4.80%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and VUG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and VUG has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
VUG

Utilities

100.0%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Communication Services

-

17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

4.3%

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Industrials

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

53.5%

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
VUG
0.9%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

XLU

-

VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

VUG
1.5%

Energy

XLU

-

VUG
0.4%

Financial Services

XLU

-

VUG
4.3%

Healthcare

XLU

-

VUG
4.6%

Industrials

XLU

-

VUG
3.6%

Real Estate

XLU

-

VUG
1.0%

Technology

XLU

-

VUG
53.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

4.44

-1.60

XLU vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-50.68%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-16.53%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-22.85%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-35.61%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-35.61%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.06%

-5.73%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-7.09%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

4.78%

-0.55%

Volatility

XLU vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

5.86%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

13.00%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

16.47%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

22.31%

-4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

21.48%

-2.21%

XLU vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.70%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and VUG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to XLU (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.88% vs 9.14% for XLU. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer