XLU vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.19%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for SPYG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

XLU vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 9.19%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.

XLU

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -5.69%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

SPYG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 8.31%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 14.92%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 16.62%
• 10Y*: 18.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	3.55%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	14.87%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and SPYG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and SPYG has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLU	SPYG
Utilities	100.0%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	8.5%
Healthcare	-	5.8%
Industrials	-	5.0%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Technology	-	51.9%

Return for Risk

XLU vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 21
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLU	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	2.27	-1.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	3.07	-2.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.39	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	2.71	-1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	11.22	-8.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLU vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLU	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	2.27	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.79	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.89	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.36	+0.04

Drawdowns

XLU vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-67.63%	+15.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-13.76%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-22.14%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-32.67%	+7.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	-32.67%	-3.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.38%	-0.15%	-7.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-24.33%	+14.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	3.32%	+0.75%

Volatility

XLU vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.15%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	4.15%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.76%	12.43%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.56%	16.04%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	21.17%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	20.65%	-1.39%

XLU vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLU vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than SPYG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.46%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.71%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and SPYG in my portfolio?

XLU and SPYG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLU or SPYG?

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPYG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, XLU or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.32% vs 9.19% for XLU. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLU or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLU or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLU or SPYG?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.46% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between XLU and SPYG?

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.