XLU vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

XLU vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.20%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.

XLU

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: 13.79%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 20.32%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 18.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	5.04%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	2.58%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and SCHG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and SCHG has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLU	SCHG
Utilities	100.0%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.6%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	6.6%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Technology	-	46.7%

Return for Risk

XLU vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 33
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLU	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.18	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.64	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.14	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	3.78	-0.98

XLU vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLU vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-34.59%	-17.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-16.41%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-23.39%	+6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-34.59%	+9.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	-34.59%	-1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.05%	-5.33%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-5.20%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	4.96%	-0.71%

Volatility

XLU vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	5.14%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.68%	12.30%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	15.95%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	22.33%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.27%	21.58%	-2.31%

XLU vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLU vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.67%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and SCHG in my portfolio?

XLU and SCHG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLU or SCHG?

XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, XLU or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 9.20% for XLU. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLU or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLU or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLU or SCHG?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between XLU and SCHG?

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.