XLU vs. EMLC
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.
Performance
XLU vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 9.20%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
XLU vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and EMLC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
EMLC
XLU vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 4.75 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -32.43% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -6.19% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -9.15% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -23.91% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -26.47% | -9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -3.83% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -14.35% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 1.86% | +2.39% |
Volatility
XLU vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.44%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 2.44% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 6.17% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 7.06% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 9.14% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 10.04% | +9.23% |
XLU vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and EMLC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.20% vs 2.28% for EMLC. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMLC.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 2.67% for XLU.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while EMLC is Emerging Markets Bonds. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.30% for EMLC.
EMLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer