XLSI vs. QYLD
XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. XLSI is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
XLSI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
XLSI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
XLSI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 1.78% | -0.33% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLSI and QYLD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.04 |
XLSI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLSI
QYLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLSI
QYLD
Basic Materials
XLSI
-
QYLD
Communication Services
XLSI
-
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
XLSI
-
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
XLSI
-
QYLD
Energy
XLSI
-
QYLD
Healthcare
XLSI
-
QYLD
Industrials
XLSI
-
QYLD
Real Estate
XLSI
-
QYLD
Technology
XLSI
-
QYLD
Utilities
XLSI
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLSI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
XLSI
QYLD
XLSI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLSI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.59 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
XLSI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLSI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -24.75% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -0.06% | -6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -3.84% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
XLSI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLSI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 8.58% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 14.70% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 15.49% | -5.05% |
XLSI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLSI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.76% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLSI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 10.76% for XLSI.
XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for XLSI and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer