XLSI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

XLSI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.02% return.

XLSI

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	3.26%	-1.06%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.02%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and OMAH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.36

XLSI vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLSI	OMAH
Financial Services	99.6%	37.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	19.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.2%
Energy	-	8.8%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	11.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLSI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 52
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLSI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.48	—

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLSI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-11.83%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-2.23%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-1.27%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLSI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	8.06%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.70%	13.05%	-2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.70%	13.05%	-2.35%

XLSI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLSI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, less than OMAH's 15.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.38%	12.86%
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.61%	5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLSI and OMAH in my portfolio?

XLSI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLSI or OMAH?

On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLSI or OMAH?

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLSI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.38%, compared with 10.61% for XLSI.

What is the main difference between XLSI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.95% for OMAH.