PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSI vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLSI vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.66% return.


XLSI

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLSI vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and BIL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLSI vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSI vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLSIBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

353.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,801.35

XLSI vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSIBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-0.78%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

0.00%

-5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-0.26%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

XLSI vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLSIBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

0.20%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.70%

0.26%

+10.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

0.26%

+10.44%

XLSI vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLSI vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
XLSI
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
10.61%5.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLSI and BIL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLSI.

XLSI has the higher dividend yield at 10.61%, compared with 3.85% for BIL.

XLSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLSI and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer