XLSI vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLSI (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XLSI returned 6.59% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XLSI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

XLSI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSI achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

XLSI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.55%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.53%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$285.83K	$265.98K	$245.15K

XLSI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	6.67%	-1.06%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	20.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XLSI and AMDW is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	-0.20

XLSI vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLSI	AMDW
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	98.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	19.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLSI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLSI

XLSI Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XLSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XLSI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLSI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLSI	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.36	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.92	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.36	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	5.83	-4.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.87	11.47	-9.60

XLSI vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSI and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLSI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSI drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSI and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLSI	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-34.64%	+26.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-34.64%	+26.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-21.39%	+19.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-13.97%	+10.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	17.59%	-13.77%

Volatility

XLSI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLSI) is 4.23%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that XLSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLSI	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	28.87%	-24.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	67.40%	-58.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	85.70%	-74.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	85.05%	-73.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	85.05%	-73.88%

XLSI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLSI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

XLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%
XLSI Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.89%	5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLSI and AMDW in my portfolio?

XLSI and AMDW have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLSI or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to XLSI (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLSI dropped -7.87% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, XLSI or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs 6.59% for XLSI. On fees, XLSI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLSI or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLSI or AMDW?

XLSI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLSI or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 11.89% for XLSI.

What is the main difference between XLSI and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLSI and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.