PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLO vs. NANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLO vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (XLO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLO achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 9.12% return.


XLO

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.44%
6M
9.38%
YTD
1.64%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
-37.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-48.19%

NANC

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.64%
6M
8.71%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$826.89K$806.25K$1.03M
$219.41K$430.38K$430.08K

XLO vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XLO
Xilio Therapeutics, Inc.
1.64%-32.96%73.64%-84.29%
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
9.12%18.54%26.83%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XLO and NANC is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023

0.17

The correlation between XLO and NANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLO vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLO
XLO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLO vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (XLO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLONANCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

1.47

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

5.80

-5.78

XLO vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLO and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLO vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLO drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLO and NANC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLONANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.01%

-20.94%

-77.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.90%

-12.21%

-28.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.74%

-20.94%

-61.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.41%

-1.72%

-95.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.94%

-2.64%

-86.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.72%

3.09%

+21.63%

Volatility

XLO vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (XLO) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 4.54%. This indicates that XLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLONANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

4.54%

+5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.48%

11.90%

+22.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.54%

14.96%

+32.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.02%

16.81%

+103.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.02%

16.81%

+103.21%

Dividends

XLO vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

XLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
0.19%0.21%0.20%0.94%
XLO
Xilio Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLO and NANC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLO has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to NANC (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLO dropped -98.01% vs NANC's -20.94%.

NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLO and NANC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer