XLO vs. NANC
XLO (Xilio Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock, while NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive. Over the past 3 years, XLO returned -41.99%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for NANC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLO vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLO achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 9.48% return.
XLO
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -17.59%
- 1Y
- -13.92%
- 3Y*
- -41.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NANC
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLO vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLO Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. | -9.12% | -32.96% | 73.64% | -84.59% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 9.48% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 20.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLO and NANC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.16 |
The correlation between XLO and NANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLO vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
XLO
NANC
XLO vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (XLO) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.14 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 8.86 | -9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 1.93 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 1.38 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
XLO vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLO drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLO and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.01% | -20.94% | -77.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.90% | -12.21% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.78% | -20.94% | -62.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.68% | -1.34% | -96.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -2.67% | -86.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.36% | 2.95% | +19.41% |
Volatility
XLO vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. (XLO) has a higher volatility of 17.86% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 3.65%. This indicates that XLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLO | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.86% | 3.65% | +14.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.24% | 10.38% | +23.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.61% | 13.60% | +33.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.86% | 16.73% | +105.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.86% | 16.73% | +105.13% |
Dividends
XLO vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
XLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
XLO Xilio Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLO and NANC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLO has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to NANC (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLO dropped -98.01% vs NANC's -20.94%.
NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLO and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer