XLKI vs. ENFR
XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. XLKI is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XLKI vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 26.07% return.
XLKI
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- YTD
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 27.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
XLKI vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 15.15% | 10.02% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.07% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKI and ENFR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKI vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
XLKI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
XLKI vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKI vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -68.28% | +58.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -3.84% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -15.89% | +14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility
XLKI vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKI | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 15.06% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 19.27% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 24.65% | -5.56% |
XLKI vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLKI and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XLKI vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.21%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 17.21% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKI and ENFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.21%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.
XLKI is categorized as Technology Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C.
Find the right allocation for XLKI and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer