XLK vs. GIS
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.04%/yr vs -3.08%/yr for GIS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLK vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 25.04%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.08% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 28.09%
- 6M
- 25.10%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.04%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -26.51%
- 6M
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.08%
XLK vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.09% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.51% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and GIS is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.19 |
The correlation between XLK and GIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
GIS
XLK vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.74 | +0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | -0.95 | +4.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | -1.94 | +13.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | -1.52 | +4.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | -0.40 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | -0.14 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
XLK vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -59.63% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -37.97% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -55.56% | +29.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -59.63% | +26.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -59.63% | +26.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -58.42% | +51.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -10.27% | -24.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 18.63% | -13.83% |
Volatility
XLK vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.96%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 6.96% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.32% | 18.58% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.08% | 23.84% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 21.13% | +3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 22.09% | +2.51% |
Dividends
XLK vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than GIS's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.36% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and GIS have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to GIS (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs GIS's -59.63%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer