XLK vs. XLE
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 23.06%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for XLE. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLK vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 23.06%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -10.16%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 23.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.00%
XLE
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- 18.80%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.76B | $1.75B | $1.99B | |
| $1.55B | $1.65B | $2.21B |
XLK vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 15.98% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.99% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and XLE is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.37 |
The correlation between XLK and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLK vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
XLE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
XLE
-
Communication Services
XLK
XLE
-
Energy
XLK
XLE
Industrials
XLK
XLE
-
Basic Materials
XLK
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
XLE
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
XLK
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
XLK
-
XLE
-
Utilities
XLK
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
XLE
XLK vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.41 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | 6.42 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -71.26% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -14.98% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -20.14% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -26.04% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -66.81% | +33.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.86% | -5.57% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -17.93% | -16.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 5.67% | +0.10% |
Volatility
XLK vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.09%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.09% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.25% | 16.71% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.01% | 21.11% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 25.79% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 29.59% | -4.74% |
XLK vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLK and XLE have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.48% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and XLE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to XLE (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 23.06% vs 10.08% for XLE. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.06% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK and XLE have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.48% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer