PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETS vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JETS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JETS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
-12.26%11.64%33.21%11.42%-19.01%-5.13%-28.93%14.38%-14.30%18.66%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.93%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -12.26% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 0.33%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


JETS

1D
4.19%
1M
-13.43%
YTD
-12.26%
6M
0.74%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
-1.57%
10Y*
0.33%

IWM

1D
3.50%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.02%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JETS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JETS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS
JETS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JETSIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

1.11

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

1.66

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.82

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.36

6.76

-4.40

JETS vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JETSIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.11

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.15

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

0.43

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.34

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and IWM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JETS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than IWM's 1.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
0.95%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%0.04%1.24%0.09%1.57%0.58%0.17%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.02%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Drawdowns

JETS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and IWM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JETSIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-59.05%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

-13.74%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.70%

-31.91%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-41.13%

-23.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.90%

-7.91%

-18.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-10.83%

-14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

3.70%

+3.73%

Volatility

JETS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JETSIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

7.47%

+3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.19%

14.47%

+7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.76%

23.18%

+14.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

22.55%

+9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.88%

22.99%

+10.89%