JETS vs. V
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index, while V (Visa Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, JETS returned 4.71%/yr vs 16.73%/yr for V. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JETS vs. V - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly higher than V's -5.95% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed V with an annualized return of 4.71%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 16.73% annualized return.
JETS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 42.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
V
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 6M
- -6.66%
- 1Y
- -3.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.73%
JETS vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 11.08% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -14.30% | 18.66% |
V Visa Inc. | -5.95% | 11.76% | 22.32% | 26.31% | -3.40% | -0.31% | 17.12% | 43.33% | 16.49% | 47.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and V is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. V — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
V
JETS vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETS | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | -0.22 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | -0.46 | +5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETS vs. V - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than V's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and V.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -51.90% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -17.18% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -20.38% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -28.60% | -12.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -36.36% | -28.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -11.31% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.12% | -8.27% | -16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.46% | 8.06% | +1.40% |
Volatility
JETS vs. V - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.89%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 5.89% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.68% | 16.80% | +8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.15% | 21.44% | +11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 22.84% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 24.43% | +9.80% |
Dividends
JETS vs. V - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than V's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
V Visa Inc. | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and V have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to V (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs V's -51.90%.
JETS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and V
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer