PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLII vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLII vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.87% return.


XLII

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.45%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.87%
6M
6.41%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
31.59%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLII and GLDM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.25

XLII vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLII
GLDM

Financial Services

100.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLII
100.3%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

XLII

-

GLDM
100.0%

Communication Services

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Energy

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Healthcare

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Industrials

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Real Estate

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Technology

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Utilities

XLII

-

GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLII vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLII

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLII vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLII vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIIGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.02

+0.42

Drawdowns

XLII vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIIGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-21.63%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-16.95%

+16.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-6.22%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

Volatility

XLII vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIIGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

26.38%

-14.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

17.90%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.55%

16.85%

-5.30%

XLII vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLII vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLII and GLDM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLII.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while GLDM is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.10% for GLDM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLII and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer