XLII vs. ACYS
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XLII vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XLII
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLII vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and ACYS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLII vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -0.63% | -9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.10% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -0.14% | -1.13% |
Volatility
XLII vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 3.38% | +8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 3.38% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 3.38% | +8.74% |
XLII vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.13% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLII and ACYS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XLII and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer