ACYS vs. SFYI
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for SFYI.
Performance
ACYS vs. SFYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS vs. SFYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | -0.44% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and SFYI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. SFYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. SFYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, which is greater than SFYI's maximum drawdown of -0.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and SFYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | SFYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.43% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.43% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -0.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ACYS vs. SFYI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | SFYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 11.09% | -7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 11.09% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 11.09% | -7.62% |
ACYS vs. SFYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYI's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. SFYI - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and SFYI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
ACYS has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.73% for SFYI.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and SFYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer