XLG vs. VOTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while VOTE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLG returned 14.28%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for VOTE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.

Performance

XLG vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than VOTE's 8.18% return.

XLG

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 14.28%
• 10Y*: 16.94%

VOTE

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 23.56%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	1.60%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	15.50%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	8.18%	17.95%	25.23%	27.60%	-19.74%	11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and VOTE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021	0.96

The correlation between XLG and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLG vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLG	VOTE
Technology	46.8%	39.0%
Communication Services	16.0%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	9.9%
Financial Services	9.0%	10.9%
Healthcare	7.0%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.4%
Energy	2.4%	3.2%
Industrials	1.9%	8.1%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

XLG vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 39
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLG	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.85	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.53	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.60	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.77	11.48	-5.71

XLG vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLG vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than VOTE's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and VOTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLG	VOTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.39%	-25.71%	-26.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-9.10%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-19.08%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-25.71%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.91%	-3.25%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-6.10%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.06%	+1.40%

Volatility

XLG vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLG	VOTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	4.98%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.74%	10.14%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.98%	12.79%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	17.19%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	17.18%	+1.70%

XLG vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLG vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VOTE's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	0.70%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.66%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLG and VOTE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, XLG and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XLG or VOTE?

XLG has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to VOTE (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, XLG or VOTE?

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 14.28% vs 12.77% for VOTE. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLG or VOTE?

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 14.28% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLG or VOTE?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLG or VOTE?

VOTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

What is the main difference between XLG and VOTE?

XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while VOTE is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.05% for VOTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.