VOTE vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
VOTE and VB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VOTE is a passively managed fund by Engine No. 1 LLC that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2021. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both VOTE and VB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VOTE or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between VOTE and VB is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VOTE vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VOTE:
2.01
VB:
0.93
VOTE:
2.71
VB:
1.36
VOTE:
1.37
VB:
1.17
VOTE:
3.00
VB:
1.38
VOTE:
13.45
VB:
4.99
VOTE:
1.92%
VB:
3.19%
VOTE:
12.87%
VB:
17.22%
VOTE:
-25.71%
VB:
-59.58%
VOTE:
-3.84%
VB:
-7.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOTE achieves a 24.92% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.06% return.
VOTE
24.92%
-0.25%
8.08%
25.19%
N/A
N/A
VB
14.06%
-2.58%
11.24%
14.17%
9.30%
9.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VOTE vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOTE and VB have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VOTE vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VOTE vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than VB's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 0.87% | 1.33% | 1.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
VOTE vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VOTE vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) is 3.96%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that VOTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.